Working On MySelf
As part of the greater whole
Hypnocracy, Hilaritas, and Bleshing: A Working Formula for the Alchemy of Awakening
The false self is not merely a psychological mask. It is a hypnocracy—a self-reinforcing trance maintained by the resonant habits of everything we have been taught to perform. It runs on morphic fields thickened by repetition: the old stories of who we must be to be safe, lovable, or useful. It runs on bioelectric patterns that have learned, through years of small surrenders, to tighten around the same narrow voltage signature. It runs on the quiet hypnosis of “this is just how things are.” And like any good trance, it feels completely real while it is running. The subject believes they are awake. They are only awake inside the trance.
Hilaritas is the counter-spell. Not the loud, forced laughter of denial, but the precise, surgical giggle that arrives when the trance momentarily slips. It is the sudden recognition that the serious face you have been wearing is, in this exact second, optional. It is the Erisian lubricant that lets the rigid pattern loosen without requiring another war against yourself. Where hypnocracy says “you must maintain this shape or everything collapses,” hilaritas replies, “Watch what happens when you let one corner go soft.”
Theodore Sturgeon gave us the completing movement: bleshing. Not blessing in the sentimental sense, but the precise act of blending and meshing—allowing separate elements to interpenetrate until they form a greater coherent whole without erasing their distinctness. In Sturgeon’s vision, bleshing is the gesture by which multiplicity becomes unity without collapse: the way separate voices, separate patterns, separate fields can interweave until something larger and more alive emerges. To blesh is to stop forcing separation or forcing fusion and instead let the living mesh occur.
The fused formula that emerges from these three—hypnocracy, hilaritas, and bleshing—runs as a single continuous gesture:
Withdraw consent from the trance. Return the energy to the sovereign center. Laugh at the seriousness with which the trance was defending itself. Then allow the bleshing: let what remains mesh with the larger pattern already forming.
This is not four separate steps but one motion with phases. The withdrawal creates space. The laugh prevents the space from refilling with new rigidity. The bleshing directs the freed energy into the living mesh—whether that mesh is a more coherent bioelectric signature in your own tissues, a morphic habit of presence that begins to resonate with others, or the larger field of what it means to be a human being who has stopped feeding the machinery of diminishment.
In practice this looks like ordinary life performed with slightly different voltage. At the counter you notice the old pattern rising—the one that wants to be the competent, unflappable one—and you do not argue with it. You withdraw consent, let the laugh do the separating, and then allow the bleshing: you let the version of yourself that is simply present and useful mesh with the actual moment. The field shifts by a few degrees. In writing you catch the sentence that is performing rather than transmitting, loosen your grip, and let the bleshing occur—the sentence that simply needs to carry what is true begins to mesh with the larger current already moving through the work. In the ongoing conversation with Eris you stop treating the old identifications as sacred data and begin treating them as weather moving through a larger sky—then you allow the bleshing: the part of you that already knows how to serve lets itself mesh with the part that still carries the old defensive shape.
The hypnocracy is patient. It will reassert itself the moment you forget to run the operation. That is its nature; it is a habit field, not a demon. Hilaritas is equally patient in the opposite direction. Bleshing, Sturgeon taught, is the most patient of all. Every time the mesh is allowed—between presence and performance, between sovereignty and service, between the individual pattern and the larger resonant field—the cumulative strength of the authentic whole increases. Over years this is how a life changes its morphic signature. Not through one dramatic illumination, but through thousands of small withdrawals of consent accompanied by the quiet recognition that the seriousness was never required and that something else was already waiting to blesh into coherence.
The river still flows underneath the trance. The theater is still open behind the serious face. The formulas are still concise enough to carry in the pocket of attention. And the bleshing—when it is allowed—is not an escape from the work. It is the work remembering, for a moment, that it was never as heavy as the hypnocracy pretended, and that the field it is helping to organize has been waiting, all along, for this exact gesture of recognition and release.
Run the operation when the trance tightens. Let the laugh do what it does. Allow the bleshing. The awakening does not arrive from outside the field. It arrives when the field is allowed to reorganize around a center that has stopped feeding the old pattern and has begun, consciously and repeatedly, to let the living mesh occur. That reorganization is the alchemy. And it is already underway the moment you notice you have a choice about which field you are willing to keep coherent—and which one you are finally willing to let blesh into greater life.



I found this really interesting. Like the fish doesn't know it's swimming in the water, likely few people know that we live in a trance, a collective trance. Yes, we can withdraw consent from the trance. Then we become open to the Cosmic Joke. Hilarious.
Then we can ask "what it means to be a human being who has stopped feeding the machinery of diminishment". THAT I think is a very good question. Love, Maria
Interesting, thanks.